
Nobel laureate , Prof . Wole Soyinka, has questioned the legality of the lockdown ordered by the President , Major General Muhammadu Buhari ( retd . ) .
According to reports, Buhari had ordered the lockdown of Abuja , Lagos and Ogun States in a bid to curb the spread of coronavirus in the country.
But Soyinka in a statement wondered if the president has the power to order such lockdown .
The Nobel laureate called on constitutional lawyers and lawmakers to clarify the legality or illegality of the lockdown .
He also warned against “constitutional piracy” in the fight against coronavirus in the country .
The statement , titled ‘ Between COVID and Constitutional Encroachment ’ , read in part , “ Constitutional lawyers and our elected representatives should kindly step into this and educate us , mere lay minds . The worst development I can conceive of us is to have a situation where rational measures for the containment of the Coronavirus pandemic are rejected on account of their questionable genesis .
“ This is a time for Unity of Purpose , not nitpicking dissensions . So , before this becomes a habit, a question : does President Buhari have the powers to close down state borders ? We want clear answers . We are not in a war emergency .
“ Appropriately focussed on measures for the saving lives , and committed to making sacrifices for the preservation of our communities , we should nonetheless remain alert to any encroachment on constitutionally demarcated powers . We need to exercise collective vigilance, and not compromise the future by submitting to interventions that are not backed by law and constitution.
“ Who actually instigates these orders anyway ? From where do they really emerge ? What happens when the orders conflict with state measures , the product of a systematic containment strategy – ` including even trial – and – error and hiccups – undertaken without let or leave of the Centre . So far , the anti – COVID- 19 measures have proceeded along the rails of decentralised thinking , multilateral collaboration and technical exchanges between states .
“ The Centre is obviously part of the entire process , and one expects this to be the norm , even without the epidemic ’ s frontal assault on the Presidency itself . Indeed , the Centre is expected to drive the overall effort , but in collaboration, with extraordinary budgeting and refurbishing of facilities .
“ The universal imperative and urgency of this affliction should not become an opportunistic launch pad for a sneak RE – CENTRALISATION , no matter how seemingly insignificant its appearance . I urge governors and legislators to be especially watchful. No epidemic is ever cured with constitutional piracy. It only lays down new political viruses for the future . ”






